Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chick Meehan vs Jack Owsley
Chick Meehan: 77th pct vs Jack Owsley: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chick Meehan vs Jack Owsley
Chick Meehan: 77th pct vs Jack Owsley: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Chick Meehan
Chick Meehan: 80th pct vs Jack Owsley: 71st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Chick Meehan
Chick Meehan: 79th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chick Meehan vs Jack Owsley
Chick Meehan: 0 titles vs Jack Owsley: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Jack Owsley
Jack Owsley: 21 seasons vs Chick Meehan: 18 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jack Owsley
Jack Owsley: 86.1% vs Chick Meehan: 76.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jack Owsley
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Chick Meehan
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-0 • SRS 13.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chick Meehan
Nearest year 1920 • Syracuse
6-2-1 • SRS 16.5 • SP Overall —
Jack Owsley trails by a 2.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Owsley | |||||
| Yale | 1905-1905 | 1 | 10-0 | 13.8 | 13.8 |
| Navy | 1925-1925 | 1 | 5-2-1 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
| Chick Meehan | |||||
| Syracuse | 1920-1924 | 5 | 35-8-4 | 14.8 | 18.0Highest peak |
| Manhattan | 1937-1937 | 1 | 6-3-1 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Closing takeaway
15-2-1 • 86.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
11.8 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Yale 1905
SRS 13.8
Worst Season
Navy 1925
SRS 11.8
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1925
-2.0 SRS
41-11-5 • 76.3% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
18.0 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Syracuse 1923
SRS 18.0
Worst Season
Manhattan 1937
SRS 4.3
Biggest Improvement
Syracuse 1923
2.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.