Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Bobby Hauck vs George Chaump
Bobby Hauck: 11th pct vs George Chaump: 10th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
George ChaumpBobby Hauck
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Bobby Hauck
Bobby Hauck: 18th pct vs George Chaump: 12th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: George Chaump
George Chaump: 90th pct vs Bobby Hauck: 77th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bobby Hauck vs George Chaump
Bobby Hauck: 0 titles vs George Chaump: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bobby Hauck vs George Chaump
Bobby Hauck: 5 seasons vs George Chaump: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: George Chaump
George Chaump: 25.4% vs Bobby Hauck: 23.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
George Chaump and Bobby Hauck look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarGeorge Chaump and Bobby Hauck look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
George Chaump
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.1
10th pct
Lower end
Bobby Hauck
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.5
9th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
George ChaumpBobby Hauck
EliteStrongAverageLean
1990Actual season year • SRS range -21.1 to -8.32014
Active comparison point
George Chaump • 1990
1990 Navy
Best season5-6 • SRS -11.8 • SP Overall -13.3
Win %
45.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
23.5 / 34.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bobby Hauck
Nearest year 2010 • UNLV
2-11 • SRS -16.5 • SP Overall -24.0
George Chaump holds a 4.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +5.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Chaump | |||||
| Navy | 1990-1994 | 5 | 14-41 | -16.7 | -11.8 |
| Bobby Hauck | |||||
| UNLV | 2010-2014 | 5 | 15-49 | -16.5 | -8.3Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →George Chaump
14-41 • 25.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
90th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Navy 1990
SRS -11.8
Worst Season
Navy 1994
SRS -20.1
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1992
6.1 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Bobby Hauck
15-49 • 23.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
-8.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
UNLV 2013
SRS -8.3
Worst Season
UNLV 2014
SRS -21.1
Biggest Improvement
UNLV 2013
7.4 SRS