Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Berrien vs George Little
Frank Berrien: 78th pct vs George Little: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Berrien vs George Little
Frank Berrien: 78th pct vs George Little: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Berrien
Frank Berrien: 82nd pct vs George Little: 77th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: George Little
George Little: 80th pct vs Frank Berrien: 68th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Berrien vs George Little
Frank Berrien: 0 titles vs George Little: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Berrien vs George Little
Frank Berrien: 3 seasons vs George Little: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Berrien
Frank Berrien: 77.6% vs George Little: 75.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Berrien
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George Little
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-2-1 • SRS 18.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
79.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Little
Nearest year 1924 • Michigan
6-2 • SRS 16.4 • SP Overall —
Frank Berrien holds a 2.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Berrien | |||||
| Navy | 1908-1910 | 3 | 21-5-3 | 13.6 | 18.6Highest peak |
| George Little | |||||
| Michigan | 1924-1924 | 1 | 6-2 | 16.4Best quality | 16.4 |
| Wisconsin | 1925-1926 | 2 | 11-3-2 | 11.2 | 15.8 |
Closing takeaway
21-5-3 • 77.6% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
18.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Navy 1908
SRS 18.6
Worst Season
Navy 1909
SRS 5.9
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1910
10.3 SRS
17-5-2 • 75.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
80th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Michigan 1924
SRS 16.4
Worst Season
Wisconsin 1926
SRS 6.5
Biggest Improvement
Wisconsin 1925
-0.6 SRS