Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Tim Beckman vs Sonny Cumbie
Tim Beckman: 25th pct vs Sonny Cumbie: 22nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Tim Beckman vs Sonny Cumbie
Tim Beckman: 25th pct vs Sonny Cumbie: 22nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Sonny Cumbie
Sonny Cumbie: 32nd pct vs Tim Beckman: 27th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Sonny Cumbie vs Tim Beckman
Sonny Cumbie: 69th pct vs Tim Beckman: 68th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Sonny Cumbie vs Tim Beckman
Sonny Cumbie: 0 titles vs Tim Beckman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Tim Beckman vs Sonny Cumbie
Tim Beckman: 6 seasons vs Sonny Cumbie: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Tim Beckman
Tim Beckman: 40.3% vs Sonny Cumbie: 30.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tim Beckman has the edge in overall strength.
Tim Beckman has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Sonny Cumbie
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.8
36th pct
Lower end
Tim Beckman
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -5.3
41th pct
Mixed
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
2-3 • SRS -1.7 • SP Overall 9.8
Win %
40.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
34.6 / 27.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Tim Beckman
Nearest year 2014 • Illinois
6-7 • SRS -4.0 • SP Overall 0.4
Sonny Cumbie holds a 2.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +6.3 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonny Cumbie | |||||
| Texas Tech | 2021-2021 | 1 | 2-3 | -1.7Best quality | -1.7Highest peak |
| Louisiana Tech | 2022-2025 | 4 | 11-26 | -11.3 | -3.9 |
| Tim Beckman | |||||
| Toledo | 2009-2010 | 2 | 13-12 | -10.9 | -6.8 |
| Illinois | 2012-2014 | 3 | 12-25 | -8.0 | -3.4 |
Closing takeaway
13-29 • 30.9% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
-1.7 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Texas Tech 2021
SRS -1.7
Worst Season
Louisiana Tech 2023
SRS -14.4
Biggest Improvement
Louisiana Tech 2025
8.7 SRS
25-37 • 40.3% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Illinois 2013
SRS -3.4
Worst Season
Illinois 2012
SRS -16.5
Biggest Improvement
Illinois 2013
13.1 SRS