Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Paul Haynes vs Norm Chow
Paul Haynes: 11th pct vs Norm Chow: 9th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Paul HaynesNorm Chow
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Paul Haynes vs Norm Chow
Paul Haynes: 15th pct vs Norm Chow: 13th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Norm Chow vs Paul Haynes
Norm Chow: 80th pct vs Paul Haynes: 79th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Norm Chow vs Paul Haynes
Norm Chow: 0 titles vs Paul Haynes: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Paul Haynes vs Norm Chow
Paul Haynes: 5 seasons vs Norm Chow: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Haynes
Paul Haynes: 23.7% vs Norm Chow: 21.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Paul Haynes has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgePaul Haynes has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Paul Haynes
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.3
17th pct
Lower end
Norm Chow
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.2
12th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Paul HaynesNorm Chow
EliteStrongAverageLean
2012Actual season year • SRS range -22.7 to -10.52017
Active comparison point
Paul Haynes • 2016
2016 Kent State
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-9 • SRS -10.5 • SP Overall -12.0
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
+7.4
SP Off / Def
16.6 / 27.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Norm Chow
Nearest year 2015 • Hawai'i
2-7 • SRS -21.7 • SP Overall -16.3
Paul Haynes holds a 11.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: 0.0 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haynes | |||||
| Kent State | 2013-2017 | 5 | 14-45 | -16.0 | -10.5Highest peak |
| Norm Chow | |||||
| Hawai'i | 2012-2015 | 4 | 10-36 | -16.6 | -11.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Haynes
14-45 • 23.7% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kent State 2016
SRS -10.5
Worst Season
Kent State 2017
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
Kent State 2016
7.4 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Norm Chow
10-36 • 21.7% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Hawai'i 2014
SRS -11.7
Worst Season
Hawai'i 2015
SRS -21.7
Biggest Improvement
Hawai'i 2013
7.9 SRS