Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Joe Hollis vs Jim Corrigall
Joe Hollis: 7th pct vs Jim Corrigall: 5th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jim CorrigallJoe Hollis
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Joe Hollis vs Jim Corrigall
Joe Hollis: 10th pct vs Jim Corrigall: 8th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Corrigall
Jim Corrigall: 61st pct vs Joe Hollis: 56th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jim Corrigall vs Joe Hollis
Jim Corrigall: 0 titles vs Joe Hollis: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Joe Hollis vs Jim Corrigall
Joe Hollis: 5 seasons vs Jim Corrigall: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Hollis
Joe Hollis: 23.2% vs Jim Corrigall: 19.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Corrigall and Joe Hollis look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarJim Corrigall and Joe Hollis look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim Corrigall
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.4
5th pct
Lower end
Joe Hollis
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -23.1
4th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jim CorrigallJoe Hollis
EliteStrongAverageLean
1994Actual season year • SRS range -30.3 to -14.32001
Active comparison point
Jim Corrigall • 1997
1997 Kent State
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-8 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall -13.3
Win %
27.3%
YoY SRS
+15.1
SP Off / Def
40.6 / 48.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joe Hollis
Nearest year 1997 • Arkansas State
2-9 • SRS -29.1 • SP Overall —
Jim Corrigall holds a 13.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +27.1 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Corrigall | |||||
| Kent State | 1994-1997 | 4 | 8-35-1 | -25.3 | -15.2 |
| Joe Hollis | |||||
| Arkansas State | 1997-2001 | 5 | 13-43 | -21.4Best quality | -14.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Jim Corrigall
8-35-1 • 19.3% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
61st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Kent State 1997
SRS -15.2
Worst Season
Kent State 1996
SRS -30.3
Biggest Improvement
Kent State 1997
15.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Joe Hollis
13-43 • 23.2% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Arkansas State 1999
SRS -14.3
Worst Season
Arkansas State 1997
SRS -29.1
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas State 1999
8.1 SRS