Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Larry Blakeney
Larry Blakeney: 36th pct vs Buddy Teevens: 28th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Buddy TeevensLarry Blakeney
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Buddy Teevens
Buddy Teevens: 60th pct vs Larry Blakeney: 53rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Larry Blakeney
Larry Blakeney: 29th pct vs Buddy Teevens: 21st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Buddy Teevens vs Larry Blakeney
Buddy Teevens: 0 titles vs Larry Blakeney: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Larry Blakeney vs Buddy Teevens
Larry Blakeney: 14 seasons vs Buddy Teevens: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Larry Blakeney
Larry Blakeney: 50.6% vs Buddy Teevens: 22.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Larry Blakeney has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeLarry Blakeney has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Buddy Teevens
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.2
29th pct
Lower end
Larry Blakeney
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.3
35th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Buddy TeevensLarry Blakeney
EliteStrongAverageLean
Buddy Teevens: 2002 Stanford
1992Actual season year • SRS range -23.1 to 9.72014
Active comparison point
Buddy Teevens • 2004
2004 Stanford
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-7 • SRS 9.7 • SP Overall 8.2
Win %
36.4%
YoY SRS
+16.4
SP Off / Def
29.6 / 22.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Larry Blakeney
Nearest year 2004 • Troy
7-5 • SRS -0.8 • SP Overall 4.6
Buddy Teevens holds a 10.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +3.3 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buddy Teevens | |||||
| Tulane | 1992-1996 | 5 | 10-46 | -12.7 | -1.5 |
| Stanford | 2002-2004 | 3 | 10-23 | -0.2Best quality | 9.7Highest peak |
| Larry Blakeney | |||||
| Troy | 2001-2014 | 14 | 86-84 | -8.4 | 6.6Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Buddy Teevens
20-69 • 22.5% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
9.7 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Stanford 2004
SRS 9.7
Worst Season
Tulane 1993
SRS -19.6
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 2004
16.4 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Larry Blakeney
86-84 • 50.6% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
29th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Troy 2007
SRS 6.6
Worst Season
Troy 2005
SRS -23.1
Biggest Improvement
Troy 2007
15.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.