Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Mack Saxon
Mack Saxon: 27th pct vs Hobbs Adams: 13th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Hobbs AdamsMack Saxon
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Mack Saxon
Mack Saxon: 30th pct vs Hobbs Adams: 19th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Mack Saxon
Mack Saxon: 42nd pct vs Hobbs Adams: 34th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Hobbs Adams vs Mack Saxon
Hobbs Adams: 0 titles vs Mack Saxon: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Hobbs Adams vs Mack Saxon
Hobbs Adams: 7 seasons vs Mack Saxon: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Mack Saxon
Mack Saxon: 53.1% vs Hobbs Adams: 18.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Hobbs Adams
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Mack Saxon
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Hobbs AdamsMack Saxon
EliteStrongAverageLean
1935Actual season year • SRS range -24.6 to -2.21946
Active comparison point
Hobbs Adams • 1941
1941 Kansas State
Best seasonBiggest improvement2-5-2 • SRS -7.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
33.3%
YoY SRS
+0.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mack Saxon
Nearest year 1941 • UTEP
4-5-1 • SRS -23.2 • SP Overall —
Hobbs Adams holds a 15.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hobbs Adams | |||||
| Kansas State | 1940-1946 | 3 | 4-21-2 | -13.5 | -7.6 |
| Mack Saxon | |||||
| UTEP | 1935-1941 | 7 | 32-28-5 | -13.3 | -2.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Hobbs Adams
4-21-2 • 18.5% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kansas State 1941
SRS -7.6
Worst Season
Kansas State 1946
SRS -24.6
Biggest Improvement
Kansas State 1941
0.8 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Mack Saxon
32-28-5 • 53.1% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
27th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
UTEP 1937
SRS -2.2
Worst Season
UTEP 1941
SRS -23.2
Biggest Improvement
UTEP 1937
18.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.