Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Charles Crawford
Charles Crawford: 43rd pct vs Troy Taylor: 23rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Troy TaylorCharles Crawford
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Troy Taylor vs Charles Crawford
Troy Taylor: 23rd pct vs Charles Crawford: 23rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Crawford vs Troy Taylor
Charles Crawford: 0 titles vs Troy Taylor: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Troy Taylor vs Charles Crawford
Troy Taylor: 2 seasons vs Charles Crawford: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Charles Crawford
Charles Crawford: 75.0% vs Troy Taylor: 25.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Troy Taylor sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTroy Taylor sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Troy Taylor
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -10.1
27th pct
Lower end
Charles Crawford
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Troy TaylorCharles Crawford
EliteStrongAverageLean
1910Actual season year • SRS range -5.7 to -5.52024
Active comparison point
Troy Taylor • 2023
2023 Stanford
Best season3-9 • SRS -5.5 • SP Overall -11.9
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
21.4 / 34.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Charles Crawford
Nearest year 1910 • Virginia
6-2 • SRS -5.6 • SP Overall —
Troy Taylor holds a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troy Taylor | |||||
| Stanford | 2023-2024 | 2 | 6-18 | -5.6 | -5.5 |
| Charles Crawford | |||||
| Virginia | 1910-1910 | 1 | 6-2 | -5.6 | -5.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Troy Taylor
6-18 • 25.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Stanford 2023
SRS -5.5
Worst Season
Stanford 2024
SRS -5.7
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 2024
-0.2 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Charles Crawford
6-2 • 75.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
43rd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Virginia 1910
SRS -5.6
Worst Season
Virginia 1910
SRS -5.6
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—