Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Chuck Taylor
Chuck Taylor: 77th pct vs Shy Huntington: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Chuck TaylorShy Huntington
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Shy Huntington vs Chuck Taylor
Shy Huntington: 76th pct vs Chuck Taylor: 73rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Taylor vs Shy Huntington
Chuck Taylor: 73rd pct vs Shy Huntington: 71st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Taylor vs Shy Huntington
Chuck Taylor: 0 titles vs Shy Huntington: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Taylor vs Shy Huntington
Chuck Taylor: 7 seasons vs Shy Huntington: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Shy Huntington
Shy Huntington: 65.9% vs Chuck Taylor: 57.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chuck Taylor
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Shy Huntington
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Chuck TaylorShy Huntington
EliteStrongAverageLean
1918Actual season year • SRS range -2.6 to 16.11957
Active comparison point
Chuck Taylor • 1955
1955 Stanford
Best seasonBiggest improvement6-3-1 • SRS 14.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
65.0%
YoY SRS
+17.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#16
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Shy Huntington
Nearest year 1923 • Oregon
3-4-1 • SRS 0.1 • SP Overall —
Chuck Taylor holds a 14.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Taylor | |||||
| Stanford | 1951-1957 | 7 | 40-29-2 | 8.2 | 14.9 |
| Shy Huntington | |||||
| Oregon | 1918-1923 | 6 | 26-12-6 | 7.9 | 16.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Chuck Taylor
40-29-2 • 57.8% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
77th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Stanford 1955
SRS 14.9
Worst Season
Stanford 1954
SRS -2.6
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 1955
17.5 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Shy Huntington
26-12-6 • 65.9% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
0.1 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Oregon 1919
SRS 16.1
Worst Season
Oregon 1923
SRS 0.1
Biggest Improvement
Oregon 1921
3.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.