Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Wood
Jim Wood: 19th pct vs David Beaty: 15th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David BeatyJim Wood
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: David Beaty
David Beaty: 32nd pct vs Jim Wood: 20th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jim Wood vs David Beaty
Jim Wood: 47th pct vs David Beaty: 44th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Beaty vs Jim Wood
David Beaty: 0 titles vs Jim Wood: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jim Wood vs David Beaty
Jim Wood: 5 seasons vs David Beaty: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jim Wood
Jim Wood: 41.3% vs David Beaty: 12.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
David Beaty has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeDavid Beaty has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David Beaty
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.5
14th pct
Lower end
Jim Wood
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -19.8
7th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David BeatyJim Wood
EliteStrongAverageLean
1968Actual season year • SRS range -26.4 to -1.22018
Active comparison point
David Beaty • 2018
2018 Kansas
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-9 • SRS -1.2 • SP Overall -10.0
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
+16.2
SP Off / Def
21.9 / 31.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Wood
Nearest year 1972 • New Mexico State
2-9 • SRS -26.4 • SP Overall -25.9
David Beaty holds a 25.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -0.1 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Beaty | |||||
| Kansas | 2015-2018 | 4 | 6-42 | -13.3 | -1.2Highest peak |
| Jim Wood | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1968-1972 | 5 | 21-30-1 | -13.7 | -7.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →David Beaty
6-42 • 12.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-1.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Kansas 2018
SRS -1.2
Worst Season
Kansas 2015
SRS -18.8
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 2018
16.2 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Jim Wood
21-30-1 • 41.3% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
19th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1969
SRS -7.5
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1972
SRS -26.4
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1971
5.1 SRS