Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Tom Stidham
Tom Stidham: 76th pct vs Burton Ingwersen: 60th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Burton IngwersenTom Stidham
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Tom Stidham vs Burton Ingwersen
Tom Stidham: 74th pct vs Burton Ingwersen: 72nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Tom Stidham
Tom Stidham: 60th pct vs Burton Ingwersen: 48th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Burton Ingwersen vs Tom Stidham
Burton Ingwersen: 0 titles vs Tom Stidham: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Tom Stidham vs Burton Ingwersen
Tom Stidham: 9 seasons vs Burton Ingwersen: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Tom Stidham
Tom Stidham: 60.4% vs Burton Ingwersen: 54.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Burton Ingwersen
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Tom Stidham
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Burton IngwersenTom Stidham
EliteStrongAverageLean
Tom Stidham: 1941 Marquette
1924Actual season year • SRS range -7.4 to 15.31945
Active comparison point
Burton Ingwersen • 1929
1929 Iowa
Best season4-2-2 • SRS 14.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
62.5%
YoY SRS
+4.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Tom Stidham
Nearest year 1937 • Oklahoma
5-2-2 • SRS 6.4 • SP Overall —
Burton Ingwersen holds a 8.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burton Ingwersen | |||||
| Iowa | 1924-1931 | 8 | 33-27-4 | 5.6 | 14.4Longest stop |
| Tom Stidham | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1937-1940 | 4 | 27-8-3 | 9.6Best quality | 15.3 |
| Marquette | 1941-1945 | 5 | 20-22-2 | 2.6 | 7.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Burton Ingwersen
33-27-4 • 54.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-4.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Iowa 1929
SRS 14.4
Worst Season
Iowa 1931
SRS -4.9
Biggest Improvement
Iowa 1928
12.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Tom Stidham
47-30-5 • 60.4% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
76th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1939
SRS 15.3
Worst Season
Marquette 1944
SRS -7.4
Biggest Improvement
Marquette 1945
13.7 SRS