Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Matt Simon vs Jeff Woodruff
Matt Simon: 9th pct vs Jeff Woodruff: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Matt Simon vs Jeff Woodruff
Matt Simon: 9th pct vs Jeff Woodruff: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Woodruff vs Matt Simon
Jeff Woodruff: 6th pct vs Matt Simon: 6th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Simon
Matt Simon: 89th pct vs Jeff Woodruff: 83rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Woodruff vs Matt Simon
Jeff Woodruff: 0 titles vs Matt Simon: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Woodruff vs Matt Simon
Jeff Woodruff: 4 seasons vs Matt Simon: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Matt Simon
Matt Simon: 33.3% vs Jeff Woodruff: 23.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Simon and Jeff Woodruff look similar in overall strength.
Matt Simon and Jeff Woodruff look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jeff Woodruff
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -23.1
4th pct
Lower end
Matt Simon
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -21.9
5th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
3-8 • SRS -17.6 • SP Overall -16.2
Win %
27.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
23.7 / 37.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Matt Simon
Nearest year 1997 • North Texas
4-7 • SRS -17.6 • SP Overall -21.7
Jeff Woodruff holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +2.1 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Woodruff | |||||
| Eastern Michigan | 2000-2003 | 4 | 11-35 | -22.0 | -17.6 |
| Matt Simon | |||||
| North Texas | 1995-1997 | 3 | 11-22 | -20.0Best quality | -17.6 |
Closing takeaway
11-35 • 23.9% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Eastern Michigan 2000
SRS -17.6
Worst Season
Eastern Michigan 2002
SRS -28.2
Biggest Improvement
Eastern Michigan 2003
9.1 SRS
11-22 • 33.3% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
89th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
North Texas 1996
SRS -17.6
Worst Season
North Texas 1995
SRS -24.9
Biggest Improvement
North Texas 1996
7.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.