Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Neil Callaway vs Jeff Genyk
Neil Callaway: 14th pct vs Jeff Genyk: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jeff GenykNeil Callaway
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Neil Callaway vs Jeff Genyk
Neil Callaway: 19th pct vs Jeff Genyk: 18th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Neil Callaway vs Jeff Genyk
Neil Callaway: 79th pct vs Jeff Genyk: 79th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Genyk vs Neil Callaway
Jeff Genyk: 0 titles vs Neil Callaway: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Genyk vs Neil Callaway
Jeff Genyk: 5 seasons vs Neil Callaway: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Neil Callaway
Neil Callaway: 30.0% vs Jeff Genyk: 27.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Neil Callaway has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeNeil Callaway has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jeff Genyk
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -21.5
6th pct
Lower end
Neil Callaway
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.5
19th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jeff GenykNeil Callaway
EliteStrongAverageLean
2004Actual season year • SRS range -22.0 to -8.12011
Active comparison point
Jeff Genyk • 2005
2005 Eastern Michigan
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-7 • SRS -8.5 • SP Overall -18.5
Win %
36.4%
YoY SRS
+13.5
SP Off / Def
19.0 / 37.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Neil Callaway
Nearest year 2007 • UAB
2-10 • SRS -19.8 • SP Overall -21.7
Jeff Genyk holds a 11.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +1.2 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Genyk | |||||
| Eastern Michigan | 2004-2008 | 5 | 16-42 | -16.4 | -8.5 |
| Neil Callaway | |||||
| UAB | 2007-2011 | 5 | 18-42 | -14.8Best quality | -8.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jeff Genyk
16-42 • 27.6% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Eastern Michigan 2005
SRS -8.5
Worst Season
Eastern Michigan 2004
SRS -22.0
Biggest Improvement
Eastern Michigan 2005
13.5 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Neil Callaway
18-42 • 30.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UAB 2009
SRS -8.1
Worst Season
UAB 2011
SRS -20.1
Biggest Improvement
UAB 2008
6.1 SRS