Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Charles Studley vs Mike Houston
Charles Studley: 35th pct vs Mike Houston: 34th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Charles StudleyMike Houston
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Studley
Charles Studley: 50th pct vs Mike Houston: 44th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Houston
Mike Houston: 41st pct vs Charles Studley: 36th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Studley vs Mike Houston
Charles Studley: 0 titles vs Mike Houston: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charles Studley vs Mike Houston
Charles Studley: 6 seasons vs Mike Houston: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Studley
Charles Studley: 45.0% vs Mike Houston: 41.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Houston sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMike Houston sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charles Studley
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Mike Houston
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -5.2
41th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Charles StudleyMike Houston
EliteStrongAverageLean
1961Actual season year • SRS range -15.2 to 5.82024
Active comparison point
Charles Studley • 1964
1964 Cincinnati
Best season8-2 • SRS 5.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+3.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Houston
Nearest year 2019 • East Carolina
4-8 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall -14.0
Charles Studley holds a 21.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Studley | |||||
| Cincinnati | 1961-1966 | 6 | 27-33 | -5.8 | 5.8Highest peak |
| Mike Houston | |||||
| East Carolina | 2019-2024 | 6 | 27-38 | -4.6Best quality | 3.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Charles Studley
27-33 • 45.0% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
5.8 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Cincinnati 1964
SRS 5.8
Worst Season
Cincinnati 1961
SRS -14.1
Biggest Improvement
Cincinnati 1963
12.9 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Mike Houston
27-38 • 41.5% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
East Carolina 2022
SRS 3.8
Worst Season
East Carolina 2019
SRS -15.2
Biggest Improvement
East Carolina 2024
3.9 SRS