Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Tim Murphy
Tim Murphy: 19th pct vs Mike Sheppard: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Tim Murphy
Tim Murphy: 19th pct vs Mike Sheppard: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Tim Murphy
Tim Murphy: 31st pct vs Mike Sheppard: 25th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Sheppard
Mike Sheppard: 36th pct vs Tim Murphy: 28th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike Sheppard vs Tim Murphy
Mike Sheppard: 0 titles vs Tim Murphy: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Mike Sheppard
Mike Sheppard: 8 seasons vs Tim Murphy: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Tim Murphy
Tim Murphy: 31.8% vs Mike Sheppard: 26.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tim Murphy has the edge in overall strength.
Tim Murphy has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tim Murphy
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -11.2
25th pct
Lower end
Mike Sheppard
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.0
20th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-3 • SRS -2.0 • SP Overall 4.0
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+6.5
SP Off / Def
28.8 / 26.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Sheppard
Nearest year 1991 • New Mexico
3-9 • SRS -18.6 • SP Overall -19.7
Tim Murphy holds a 16.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +1.0 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Murphy | |||||
| Cincinnati | 1989-1993 | 5 | 17-37-1 | -12.9 | -2.0Highest peak |
| Mike Sheppard | |||||
| Long Beach State | 1984-1986 | 3 | 16-18 | -7.0Best quality | -4.6 |
| New Mexico | 1987-1991 | 5 | 9-50 | -17.4 | -6.6 |
Closing takeaway
17-37-1 • 31.8% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
-2.0 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Cincinnati 1993
SRS -2.0
Worst Season
Cincinnati 1990
SRS -24.0
Biggest Improvement
Cincinnati 1991
14.8 SRS
25-68 • 26.9% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
36th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Long Beach State 1986
SRS -4.6
Worst Season
New Mexico 1988
SRS -25.3
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico 1989
18.7 SRS