Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Robert Titchenal
Robert Titchenal: 27th pct vs Turner Gill: 22nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Turner GillRobert Titchenal
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Robert Titchenal
Robert Titchenal: 40th pct vs Turner Gill: 32nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Turner Gill
Turner Gill: 72nd pct vs Robert Titchenal: 46th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Robert Titchenal vs Turner Gill
Robert Titchenal: 0 titles vs Turner Gill: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Turner Gill vs Robert Titchenal
Turner Gill: 13 seasons vs Robert Titchenal: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Robert Titchenal
Robert Titchenal: 42.6% vs Turner Gill: 36.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Turner Gill sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTurner Gill sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Turner Gill
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.3
9th pct
Lower end
Robert Titchenal
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Turner GillRobert Titchenal
EliteStrongAverageLean
Turner Gill: 2010 KansasTurner Gill: 2018 LibertyRobert Titchenal: 1957 San José State
1953Actual season year • SRS range -24.4 to 2.52018
Active comparison point
Turner Gill • 2008
2008 Buffalo
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-6 • SRS -1.7 • SP Overall -14.4
Win %
57.1%
YoY SRS
+10.2
SP Off / Def
26.4 / 39.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Robert Titchenal
Nearest year 1964 • San José State
4-6 • SRS -6.4 • SP Overall —
Turner Gill holds a 4.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turner Gill | |||||
| Buffalo | 2006-2009 | 4 | 20-30 | -10.9 | -1.7 |
| Kansas | 2010-2011 | 2 | 5-19 | -11.3 | -10.3 |
| Liberty | 2018-2018 | 1 | 6-6 | -10.3 | -10.3 |
| Robert Titchenal | |||||
| New Mexico | 1953-1955 | 3 | 12-16-1 | -15.7 | -6.5 |
| San José State | 1957-1964 | 8 | 33-45-1 | -9.1Best quality | 2.5Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Turner Gill
31-55 • 36.0% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
72nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Buffalo 2008
SRS -1.7
Worst Season
Buffalo 2006
SRS -20.9
Biggest Improvement
Buffalo 2008
10.2 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Robert Titchenal
45-61-2 • 42.6% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
2.5 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
San José State 1958
SRS 2.5
Worst Season
New Mexico 1955
SRS -24.4
Biggest Improvement
San José State 1958
20.0 SRS