Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Dana Dimel
Dana Dimel: 25th pct vs Stan Parrish: 14th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Stan ParrishDana Dimel
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Dana Dimel
Dana Dimel: 48th pct vs Stan Parrish: 45th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Dana Dimel vs Stan Parrish
Dana Dimel: 15th pct vs Stan Parrish: 12th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dana Dimel vs Stan Parrish
Dana Dimel: 0 titles vs Stan Parrish: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Stan Parrish vs Dana Dimel
Stan Parrish: 28 seasons vs Dana Dimel: 27 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Dana Dimel
Dana Dimel: 36.2% vs Stan Parrish: 15.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dana Dimel has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeDana Dimel has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Stan Parrish
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.4
9th pct
Lower end
Dana Dimel
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -10.2
27th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Stan ParrishDana Dimel
EliteStrongAverageLean
Stan Parrish: 2008 Ball StateStan Parrish: 2013 Eastern MichiganDana Dimel: 2000 HoustonDana Dimel: 2018 UTEP
1986Actual season year • SRS range -32.4 to 5.32023
Active comparison point
Stan Parrish • 2008
2008 Ball State
Best seasonBiggest improvementNew stop: Ball State0-1 • SRS 4.2 • SP Overall 14.3
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
+25.7
SP Off / Def
38.9 / 26.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dana Dimel
Nearest year 2002 • Houston
5-7 • SRS -10.0 • SP Overall -9.0
Stan Parrish holds a 14.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +6.3 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Parrish | |||||
| Kansas State | 1986-1988 | 3 | 2-30-1 | -20.0 | -18.4 |
| Ball State | 2008-2010 | 3 | 6-19 | -11.1 | 4.2 |
| Eastern Michigan | 2013-2013 | 1 | 1-2 | -32.4 | -32.4 |
| Dana Dimel | |||||
| Wyoming | 1997-1999 | 3 | 22-13 | 1.7Best quality | 5.3Highest peak |
| Houston | 2000-2002 | 3 | 8-26 | -14.5 | -10.0 |
| UTEP | 2018-2023 | 6 | 20-49 | -16.9 | -6.7Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Stan Parrish
9-51-1 • 15.6% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Ball State 2008
SRS 4.2
Worst Season
Eastern Michigan 2013
SRS -32.4
Biggest Improvement
Ball State 2008
25.7 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Dana Dimel
50-88 • 36.2% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
25th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Wyoming 1997
SRS 5.3
Worst Season
UTEP 2019
SRS -28.1
Biggest Improvement
UTEP 2020
10.9 SRS