Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Pete Lembo
Pete Lembo: 36th pct vs David Rader: 29th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Pete Lembo
Pete Lembo: 36th pct vs David Rader: 29th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: David Rader
David Rader: 48th pct vs Pete Lembo: 36th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Pete Lembo
Pete Lembo: 72nd pct vs David Rader: 43rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Rader vs Pete Lembo
David Rader: 0 titles vs Pete Lembo: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Pete Lembo
Pete Lembo: 15 seasons vs David Rader: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Pete Lembo
Pete Lembo: 56.8% vs David Rader: 37.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Pete Lembo has the edge in overall strength.
Pete Lembo has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Pete Lembo
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.0
38th pct
Lower end
David Rader
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.1
30th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-3 • SRS 0.7 • SP Overall 7.5
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+4.7
SP Off / Def
38.3 / 31.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
David Rader
Nearest year 1999 • Tulsa
2-9 • SRS -22.9 • SP Overall -25.5
Pete Lembo holds a 23.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +16.3 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Lembo | |||||
| Ball State | 2011-2015 | 5 | 33-29 | -7.6 | 0.7 |
| Buffalo | 2024-2025 | 2 | 9-4 | -10.2 | -6.1 |
| David Rader | |||||
| Tulsa | 1988-1999 | 12 | 50-83-1 | -8.1 | 5.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
42-33 • 56.8% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
72nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ball State 2013
SRS 0.7
Worst Season
Ball State 2015
SRS -14.9
Biggest Improvement
Buffalo 2024
8.8 SRS
50-83-1 • 37.7% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
5.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Tulsa 1991
SRS 5.2
Worst Season
Tulsa 1999
SRS -22.9
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 1991
19.8 SRS