Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: John Bonamego vs Mike Working
John Bonamego: 28th pct vs Mike Working: 27th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mike WorkingJohn Bonamego
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: John Bonamego
John Bonamego: 34th pct vs Mike Working: 29th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: John Bonamego
John Bonamego: 48th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: John Bonamego vs Mike Working
John Bonamego: 0 titles vs Mike Working: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: John Bonamego
John Bonamego: 4 seasons vs Mike Working: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Working
Mike Working: 45.5% vs John Bonamego: 43.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Working has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeMike Working has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Working
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.8
33th pct
Lower end
John Bonamego
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.4
29th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mike WorkingJohn Bonamego
EliteStrongAverageLean
1980Actual season year • SRS range -18.9 to -0.22018
Active comparison point
Mike Working • 1980
1980 App State
Best season6-4-1 • SRS -2.7 • SP Overall 0.3
Win %
59.1%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
22.6 / 22.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
John Bonamego
Nearest year 2015 • Central Michigan
7-6 • SRS -0.2 • SP Overall -3.1
Mike Working trails by a 2.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.8 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Working | |||||
| App State | 1980-1981 | 2 | 9-11-2 | -9.4 | -2.7 |
| John Bonamego | |||||
| Central Michigan | 2015-2018 | 4 | 22-29 | -8.4 | -0.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Mike Working
9-11-2 • 45.5% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
-16.2 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
App State 1980
SRS -2.7
Worst Season
App State 1981
SRS -16.2
Biggest Improvement
App State 1981
-13.5 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →John Bonamego
22-29 • 43.1% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-0.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Central Michigan 2015
SRS -0.2
Worst Season
Central Michigan 2018
SRS -18.9
Biggest Improvement
Central Michigan 2017
3.5 SRS