Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Thompson vs Herman Koehler
Joseph Thompson: 69th pct vs Herman Koehler: 68th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Herman KoehlerJoseph Thompson
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Herman Koehler
Herman Koehler: 81st pct vs Joseph Thompson: 75th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Thompson
Joseph Thompson: 34th pct vs Herman Koehler: 31st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Herman Koehler vs Joseph Thompson
Herman Koehler: 0 titles vs Joseph Thompson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Thompson vs Herman Koehler
Joseph Thompson: 5 seasons vs Herman Koehler: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Joseph Thompson
Joseph Thompson: 67.4% vs Herman Koehler: 63.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Herman Koehler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Joseph Thompson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Herman KoehlerJoseph Thompson
EliteStrongAverageLean
1897Actual season year • SRS range -7.1 to 18.21912
Active comparison point
Herman Koehler • 1897
1897 Army
Best season6-1-1 • SRS 18.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
81.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joseph Thompson
Nearest year 1908 • Pittsburgh
8-3 • SRS 10.6 • SP Overall —
Herman Koehler holds a 7.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman Koehler | |||||
| Army | 1897-1900 | 4 | 20-11-3 | 7.1 | 18.2Highest peak |
| Joseph Thompson | |||||
| Pittsburgh | 1908-1912 | 5 | 30-14-2 | 7.4 | 15.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Herman Koehler
20-11-3 • 63.2% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-1.0 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Army 1897
SRS 18.2
Worst Season
Army 1899
SRS -1.0
Biggest Improvement
Army 1900
1.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Joseph Thompson
30-14-2 • 67.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Pittsburgh 1910
SRS 15.9
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1912
SRS -7.1
Biggest Improvement
Pittsburgh 1910
5.5 SRS