Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: DeOrmond McLaughry
DeOrmond McLaughry: 45th pct vs Jack Curtice: 37th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jack CurticeDeOrmond McLaughry
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: DeOrmond McLaughry
DeOrmond McLaughry: 70th pct vs Jack Curtice: 43rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Jack Curtice
Jack Curtice: 54th pct vs DeOrmond McLaughry: 17th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: DeOrmond McLaughry vs Jack Curtice
DeOrmond McLaughry: 0 titles vs Jack Curtice: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: DeOrmond McLaughry vs Jack Curtice
DeOrmond McLaughry: 29 seasons vs Jack Curtice: 29 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Jack Curtice vs DeOrmond McLaughry
Jack Curtice: 52.6% vs DeOrmond McLaughry: 51.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jack Curtice
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
DeOrmond McLaughry
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jack CurticeDeOrmond McLaughry
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jack Curtice: 1946 UTEPJack Curtice: 1950 UtahJack Curtice: 1958 StanfordJack Curtice: 1969 California-Santa BarbaraDeOrmond McLaughry: 1946 Dartmouth
1926Actual season year • SRS range -24.4 to 13.61969
Active comparison point
Jack Curtice • 1962
1962 Stanford
Best season5-5 • SRS 3.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+7.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
DeOrmond McLaughry
Nearest year 1954 • Dartmouth
3-6 • SRS -12.9 • SP Overall —
Jack Curtice holds a 16.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Curtice | |||||
| West Texas A&M | 1941-1941 | 1 | 8-2 | -5.5 | -5.5 |
| UTEP | 1946-1949 | 4 | 24-13-3 | -11.2 | -4.9 |
| Utah | 1950-1957 | 8 | 45-32-4 | -4.6 | 3.1 |
| Stanford | 1958-1962 | 5 | 14-36 | -2.6 | 3.5 |
| California-Santa Barbara | 1969-1969 | 1 | 6-4 | -14.5 | -14.5 |
| DeOrmond McLaughry | |||||
| Brown | 1926-1940 | 15 | 76-58-5 | -4.4 | 13.2Longest stop |
| Dartmouth | 1946-1954 | 9 | 33-44-2 | -3.1 | 13.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Jack Curtice
97-87-7 • 52.6% • 19 seasons • 0 titles
54th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Stanford 1962
SRS 3.5
Worst Season
UTEP 1946
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
UTEP 1947
13.6 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →DeOrmond McLaughry
109-102-7 • 51.6% • 24 seasons • 0 titles
13.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Dartmouth 1948
SRS 13.6
Worst Season
Brown 1935
SRS -24.4
Biggest Improvement
Brown 1937
16.5 SRS