Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: KC Keeler
KC Keeler: 28th pct vs Ed Cavanaugh: 21st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Ed CavanaughKC Keeler
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Ed Cavanaugh vs KC Keeler
Ed Cavanaugh: 22nd pct vs KC Keeler: 22nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Ed Cavanaugh vs KC Keeler
Ed Cavanaugh: 92nd pct vs KC Keeler: 91st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Ed Cavanaugh vs KC Keeler
Ed Cavanaugh: 0 titles vs KC Keeler: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Ed Cavanaugh vs KC Keeler
Ed Cavanaugh: 3 seasons vs KC Keeler: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: KC Keeler
KC Keeler: 50.0% vs Ed Cavanaugh: 33.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
KC Keeler and Ed Cavanaugh look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarKC Keeler and Ed Cavanaugh look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ed Cavanaugh
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.7
28th pct
Lower end
KC Keeler
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -8.6
31th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Ed CavanaughKC Keeler
EliteStrongAverageLean
KC Keeler: 2025 Temple
1980Actual season year • SRS range -13.3 to -5.82025
Active comparison point
Ed Cavanaugh • 1980
1980 Army
Best season3-7-1 • SRS -5.8 • SP Overall -4.7
Win %
31.8%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
25.4 / 30.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
KC Keeler
Nearest year 2023 • Sam Houston
3-9 • SRS -13.3 • SP Overall -13.8
Ed Cavanaugh holds a 7.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +9.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ed Cavanaugh | |||||
| Army | 1980-1982 | 3 | 10-21-2 | -9.8 | -5.8 |
| KC Keeler | |||||
| Sam Houston | 2023-2024 | 2 | 12-12 | -9.8 | -6.2 |
| Temple | 2025-2025 | 1 | 0-0 | -7.0Best quality | -7.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Ed Cavanaugh
10-21-2 • 33.3% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Army 1980
SRS -5.8
Worst Season
Army 1982
SRS -13.1
Biggest Improvement
Army 1982
-2.5 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →KC Keeler
12-12 • 50.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
28th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Sam Houston 2024
SRS -6.2
Worst Season
Sam Houston 2023
SRS -13.3
Biggest Improvement
Sam Houston 2024
7.1 SRS