Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Thomas Cahill
Thomas Cahill: 49th pct vs Mike McGee: 44th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Thomas CahillMike McGee
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Thomas Cahill
Thomas Cahill: 73rd pct vs Mike McGee: 60th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Thomas Cahill
Thomas Cahill: 24th pct vs Mike McGee: 20th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike McGee vs Thomas Cahill
Mike McGee: 0 titles vs Thomas Cahill: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mike McGee vs Thomas Cahill
Mike McGee: 9 seasons vs Thomas Cahill: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Thomas Cahill
Thomas Cahill: 50.6% vs Mike McGee: 42.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike McGee has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMike McGee has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Thomas Cahill
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.8
28th pct
Lower end
Mike McGee
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -0.9
53th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Thomas CahillMike McGee
EliteStrongAverageLean
Mike McGee: 1971 Duke
1966Actual season year • SRS range -22.7 to 14.61978
Active comparison point
Thomas Cahill • 1968
1968 Army
Best seasonBiggest improvement7-3 • SRS 14.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
70.0%
YoY SRS
+11.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike McGee
Nearest year 1970 • East Carolina
3-8 • SRS -22.7 • SP Overall -14.8
Thomas Cahill holds a 37.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Cahill | |||||
| Army | 1966-1973 | 8 | 40-39-2 | -1.2 | 14.6Highest peak |
| Mike McGee | |||||
| East Carolina | 1970-1970 | 1 | 3-8 | -22.7 | -22.7 |
| Duke | 1971-1978 | 8 | 37-47-4 | 2.9Best quality | 9.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Thomas Cahill
40-39-2 • 50.6% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
14.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Army 1968
SRS 14.6
Worst Season
Army 1973
SRS -18.5
Biggest Improvement
Army 1968
11.0 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Mike McGee
40-55-4 • 42.4% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Duke 1977
SRS 9.5
Worst Season
East Carolina 1970
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
Duke 1971
27.8 SRS