Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Thomas vs Phillip Fulmer
Frank Thomas: 97th pct vs Phillip Fulmer: 94th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Frank ThomasPhillip Fulmer
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Thomas
Frank Thomas: 98th pct vs Phillip Fulmer: 92nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Thomas
Frank Thomas: 60th pct vs Phillip Fulmer: 55th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Phillip Fulmer
Phillip Fulmer: 1 title vs Frank Thomas: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Phillip Fulmer vs Frank Thomas
Phillip Fulmer: 17 seasons vs Frank Thomas: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Thomas
Frank Thomas: 81.2% vs Phillip Fulmer: 74.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Phillip Fulmer sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgePhillip Fulmer sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Thomas
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Phillip Fulmer
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 19.9
98th pct
Elite
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Frank ThomasPhillip Fulmer
EliteStrongAverageLean
1931Actual season year • SRS range 2.9 to 31.52008
Active comparison point
Frank Thomas • 1945
1945 Alabama
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-0 • SRS 31.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+21.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Phillip Fulmer
Nearest year 1992 • Tennessee
4-0 • SRS 13.9 • SP Overall 19.3
Frank Thomas holds a 17.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Thomas | |||||
| Alabama | 1931-1946 | 15 | 115-24-7 | 16.9Best quality | 31.5Highest peak |
| Phillip Fulmer | |||||
| Tennessee | 1992-2008 | 17 | 151-52-1 | 14.9 | 24.4Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Frank Thomas
115-24-7 • 81.2% • 15 seasons • 0 titles
8.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Alabama 1945
SRS 31.5
Worst Season
Alabama 1940
SRS 8.9
Biggest Improvement
Alabama 1945
21.2 SRS
More titles
Full profile →Phillip Fulmer
151-52-1 • 74.3% • 17 seasons • 1 title
1 national championship season.
Best Season
Tennessee 1993
SRS 24.4
Worst Season
Tennessee 2008
SRS 2.9
Biggest Improvement
Tennessee 2001
11.4 SRS