Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Eli Abbott vs JO Heyworth
Eli Abbott: 32nd pct vs JO Heyworth: 32nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Eli AbbottJO Heyworth
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Eli Abbott vs JO Heyworth
Eli Abbott: 8th pct vs JO Heyworth: 8th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Eli Abbott vs JO Heyworth
Eli Abbott: 0 titles vs JO Heyworth: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Eli Abbott vs JO Heyworth
Eli Abbott: 1 seasons vs JO Heyworth: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Eli Abbott vs JO Heyworth
Eli Abbott: 50.0% vs JO Heyworth: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Eli Abbott
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
JO Heyworth
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Eli AbbottJO Heyworth
EliteStrongAverageLean
1901Actual season year • SRS range -16.2 to -14.21903
Active comparison point
Eli Abbott • 1902
1902 Alabama
Best seasonWorst season4-4 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#0
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
JO Heyworth
Nearest year 1902 • Alabama
4-4 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall —
Eli Abbott holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Abbott | |||||
| Alabama | 1902-1902 | 1 | 4-4 | -15.2 | -15.2 |
| JO Heyworth | |||||
| Alabama | 1902-1902 | 1 | 4-4 | -15.2 | -15.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Eli Abbott
4-4 • 50.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Alabama 1902
SRS -15.2
Worst Season
Alabama 1902
SRS -15.2
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →JO Heyworth
4-4 • 50.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Alabama 1902
SRS -15.2
Worst Season
Alabama 1902
SRS -15.2
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.