Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: WA Cunningham
WA Cunningham: 58th pct vs Matt Wells: 52nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Matt WellsWA Cunningham
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Wells
Matt Wells: 71st pct vs WA Cunningham: 65th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Matt Wells
Matt Wells: 52nd pct vs WA Cunningham: 37th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Matt Wells vs WA Cunningham
Matt Wells: 0 titles vs WA Cunningham: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: WA Cunningham vs Matt Wells
WA Cunningham: 10 seasons vs Matt Wells: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: WA Cunningham
WA Cunningham: 67.9% vs Matt Wells: 52.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Wells sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMatt Wells sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Matt Wells
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.8
66th pct
Above average
WA Cunningham
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Matt WellsWA Cunningham
EliteStrongAverageLean
Matt Wells: 2019 Texas Tech
1910Actual season year • SRS range -12.2 to 13.92021
Active comparison point
Matt Wells • 2018
2018 Utah State
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-2 • SRS 13.9 • SP Overall 14.2
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
+19.1
SP Off / Def
36.3 / 22.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
WA Cunningham
Nearest year 1919 • Georgia
4-2-3 • SRS -0.7 • SP Overall —
Matt Wells holds a 14.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Wells | |||||
| Utah State | 2013-2018 | 6 | 44-34 | 1.5 | 13.9Highest peak |
| Texas Tech | 2019-2021 | 3 | 13-17 | -0.3 | 2.3 |
| WA Cunningham | |||||
| Georgia | 1910-1919 | 8 | 43-18-9 | 0.9 | 11.4Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Matt Wells
57-51 • 52.8% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
52nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Utah State 2018
SRS 13.9
Worst Season
Utah State 2016
SRS -9.3
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 2018
19.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →WA Cunningham
43-18-9 • 67.9% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
58th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Georgia 1915
SRS 11.4
Worst Season
Georgia 1914
SRS -12.2
Biggest Improvement
Georgia 1915
23.6 SRS