Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Terry Shea vs Hal Mumme
Terry Shea: 30th pct vs Hal Mumme: 28th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Terry SheaHal Mumme
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Terry Shea
Terry Shea: 65th pct vs Hal Mumme: 56th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Terry Shea vs Hal Mumme
Terry Shea: 6th pct vs Hal Mumme: 6th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Hal Mumme vs Terry Shea
Hal Mumme: 0 titles vs Terry Shea: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Hal Mumme vs Terry Shea
Hal Mumme: 12 seasons vs Terry Shea: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Terry Shea
Terry Shea: 34.6% vs Hal Mumme: 32.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Hal Mumme and Terry Shea look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarHal Mumme and Terry Shea look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Terry Shea
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.0
30th pct
Lower end
Hal Mumme
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -8.7
31th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Terry SheaHal Mumme
EliteStrongAverageLean
Terry Shea: 1996 RutgersHal Mumme: 2005 New Mexico State
1990Actual season year • SRS range -27.3 to 11.22008
Active comparison point
Terry Shea • 1990
1990 San José State
Best season9-2-1 • SRS 11.2 • SP Overall 18.6
Win %
79.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
41.3 / 25.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Hal Mumme
Nearest year 1997 • Kentucky
5-6 • SRS 3.2 • SP Overall 2.6
Terry Shea holds a 8.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +1.2 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Shea | |||||
| San José State | 1990-1991 | 2 | 15-6-2 | 5.9Best quality | 11.2Highest peak |
| Rutgers | 1996-2000 | 5 | 11-44 | -16.2 | -10.7 |
| Hal Mumme | |||||
| Kentucky | 1997-2000 | 4 | 20-26 | 1.2 | 7.6 |
| New Mexico State | 2005-2008 | 4 | 11-38 | -18.8 | -9.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Terry Shea
26-50-2 • 34.6% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
11.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
San José State 1990
SRS 11.2
Worst Season
Rutgers 1997
SRS -27.3
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 1998
16.6 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Hal Mumme
31-64 • 32.6% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kentucky 1998
SRS 7.6
Worst Season
New Mexico State 2005
SRS -26.0
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 2006
16.7 SRS