Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Dan Enos
Dan Enos: 20th pct vs Mick Dennehy: 17th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mick DennehyDan Enos
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Dan Enos vs Mick Dennehy
Dan Enos: 20th pct vs Mick Dennehy: 18th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Mick Dennehy vs Dan Enos
Mick Dennehy: 90th pct vs Dan Enos: 89th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dan Enos vs Mick Dennehy
Dan Enos: 0 titles vs Mick Dennehy: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dan Enos vs Mick Dennehy
Dan Enos: 5 seasons vs Mick Dennehy: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Dan Enos
Dan Enos: 41.9% vs Mick Dennehy: 33.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mick Dennehy and Dan Enos look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarMick Dennehy and Dan Enos look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mick Dennehy
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.8
18th pct
Lower end
Dan Enos
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.8
18th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mick DennehyDan Enos
EliteStrongAverageLean
2000Actual season year • SRS range -18.3 to -7.12014
Active comparison point
Mick Dennehy • 2001
2001 Utah State
Best season4-7 • SRS -8.5 • SP Overall -3.5
Win %
36.4%
YoY SRS
+2.5
SP Off / Def
38.4 / 39.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dan Enos
Nearest year 2010 • Central Michigan
3-9 • SRS -11.1 • SP Overall -14.7
Mick Dennehy holds a 2.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +16.5 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mick Dennehy | |||||
| Utah State | 2000-2004 | 5 | 19-37 | -12.7 | -8.5 |
| Dan Enos | |||||
| Central Michigan | 2010-2014 | 5 | 26-36 | -12.9 | -7.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Mick Dennehy
19-37 • 33.9% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Utah State 2001
SRS -8.5
Worst Season
Utah State 2004
SRS -18.3
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 2003
3.4 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Dan Enos
26-36 • 41.9% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
20th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Central Michigan 2014
SRS -7.1
Worst Season
Central Michigan 2011
SRS -16.9
Biggest Improvement
Central Michigan 2014
8.2 SRS