Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jake Spavital vs Gil Bartosh
Jake Spavital: 14th pct vs Gil Bartosh: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jake SpavitalGil Bartosh
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jake Spavital vs Gil Bartosh
Jake Spavital: 18th pct vs Gil Bartosh: 17th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jake Spavital vs Gil Bartosh
Jake Spavital: 86th pct vs Gil Bartosh: 84th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Gil Bartosh vs Jake Spavital
Gil Bartosh: 0 titles vs Jake Spavital: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jake Spavital vs Gil Bartosh
Jake Spavital: 4 seasons vs Gil Bartosh: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jake Spavital
Jake Spavital: 27.1% vs Gil Bartosh: 17.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jake Spavital has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeJake Spavital has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jake Spavital
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.3
17th pct
Lower end
Gil Bartosh
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -17.7
10th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jake SpavitalGil Bartosh
EliteStrongAverageLean
1974Actual season year • SRS range -19.3 to -8.42022
Active comparison point
Jake Spavital • 2020
2020 Texas State
Best seasonBiggest improvement2-10 • SRS -8.4 • SP Overall -13.4
Win %
16.7%
YoY SRS
+10.4
SP Off / Def
23.5 / 36.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Gil Bartosh
Nearest year 1976 • UTEP
1-11 • SRS -19.3 • SP Overall -23.5
Jake Spavital holds a 10.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +7.9 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Spavital | |||||
| Texas State | 2019-2022 | 4 | 13-35 | -13.9 | -8.4 |
| Gil Bartosh | |||||
| UTEP | 1974-1976 | 3 | 6-28 | -14.3 | -9.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jake Spavital
13-35 • 27.1% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Texas State 2020
SRS -8.4
Worst Season
Texas State 2019
SRS -18.8
Biggest Improvement
Texas State 2020
10.4 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Gil Bartosh
6-28 • 17.6% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UTEP 1974
SRS -9.4
Worst Season
UTEP 1976
SRS -19.3
Biggest Improvement
UTEP 1975
-4.8 SRS