Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Phil King
Phil King: 83rd pct vs Mont McIntire: 78th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mont McIntirePhil King
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Phil King
Phil King: 100th pct vs Mont McIntire: 92nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Phil King
Phil King: 26th pct vs Mont McIntire: 17th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mont McIntire vs Phil King
Mont McIntire: 0 titles vs Phil King: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Phil King
Phil King: 10 seasons vs Mont McIntire: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Phil King
Phil King: 83.3% vs Mont McIntire: 66.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mont McIntire
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Phil King
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mont McIntirePhil King
EliteStrongAverageLean
Phil King: 1903 GeorgetownPhil King: 1905 Wisconsin
1896Actual season year • SRS range 1.9 to 38.31920
Active comparison point
Mont McIntire • 1917
1917 West Virginia
Best seasonBiggest improvement6-3-1 • SRS 24.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
65.0%
YoY SRS
+6.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Phil King
Nearest year 1905 • Wisconsin
8-2 • SRS 38.3 • SP Overall —
Mont McIntire trails by a 13.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mont McIntire | |||||
| West Virginia | 1916-1920 | 4 | 24-11-4 | 17.6 | 24.9 |
| Phil King | |||||
| Wisconsin | 1896-1905 | 8 | 65-11-1 | 18.4 | 38.3Highest peak |
| Georgetown | 1903-1903 | 1 | 7-3 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Mont McIntire
24-11-4 • 66.7% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
West Virginia 1917
SRS 24.9
Worst Season
West Virginia 1920
SRS 1.9
Biggest Improvement
West Virginia 1917
6.1 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Phil King
72-14-1 • 83.3% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
26th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Wisconsin 1905
SRS 38.3
Worst Season
Wisconsin 1897
SRS 8.9
Biggest Improvement
Wisconsin 1905
26.5 SRS