Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: MH Harvey
MH Harvey: 21st pct vs Chuck Long: 14th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
MH HarveyChuck Long
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: MH Harvey vs Chuck Long
MH Harvey: 16th pct vs Chuck Long: 15th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Chuck Long
Chuck Long: 90th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Long vs MH Harvey
Chuck Long: 0 titles vs MH Harvey: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Long vs MH Harvey
Chuck Long: 3 seasons vs MH Harvey: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: MH Harvey
MH Harvey: 44.4% vs Chuck Long: 25.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Chuck Long sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeChuck Long sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
MH Harvey
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Chuck Long
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.6
16th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
MH HarveyChuck Long
EliteStrongAverageLean
MH Harvey: 1904 Ole Miss
1902Actual season year • SRS range -17.9 to -10.12008
Active comparison point
MH Harvey • 1902
1902 Auburn
Best season0-2 • SRS -10.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chuck Long
Nearest year 2006 • San Diego State
3-9 • SRS -11.3 • SP Overall -13.2
MH Harvey holds a 1.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH Harvey | |||||
| Auburn | 1902-1902 | 1 | 0-2 | -10.1Best quality | -10.1 |
| Ole Miss | 1904-1904 | 1 | 4-3 | -15.3 | -15.3 |
| Chuck Long | |||||
| San Diego State | 2006-2008 | 3 | 9-27 | -13.2 | -10.5Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →MH Harvey
4-5 • 44.4% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
21st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Auburn 1902
SRS -10.1
Worst Season
Ole Miss 1904
SRS -15.3
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1904
-5.2 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Chuck Long
9-27 • 25.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
90th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
San Diego State 2007
SRS -10.5
Worst Season
San Diego State 2008
SRS -17.9
Biggest Improvement
San Diego State 2007
0.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.