Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Bill McCartney
Bill McCartney: 85th pct vs Milt Bruhn: 82nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Bill McCartney
Bill McCartney: 85th pct vs Milt Bruhn: 82nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Milt Bruhn
Milt Bruhn: 97th pct vs Bill McCartney: 92nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Milt Bruhn vs Bill McCartney
Milt Bruhn: 8th pct vs Bill McCartney: 7th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Bill McCartney
Bill McCartney: 1 title vs Milt Bruhn: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Bill McCartney
Bill McCartney: 13 seasons vs Milt Bruhn: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Bill McCartney
Bill McCartney: 62.4% vs Milt Bruhn: 53.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Bill McCartney sets the reference point in overall strength.
Bill McCartney sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Milt Bruhn
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Bill McCartney
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 11.2
87th pct
Elite
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-2 • SRS 29.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+18.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bill McCartney
Nearest year 1982 • Colorado
2-8-1 • SRS -8.4 • SP Overall -10.3
Milt Bruhn holds a 38.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milt Bruhn | |||||
| Wisconsin | 1956-1966 | 11 | 52-45-6 | 9.9 | 29.6Highest peak |
| Bill McCartney | |||||
| Colorado | 1982-1994 | 13 | 93-55-5 | 9.1 | 24.4Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
52-45-6 • 53.4% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
29.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Wisconsin 1962
SRS 29.6
Worst Season
Wisconsin 1966
SRS -8.4
Biggest Improvement
Wisconsin 1962
18.7 SRS
93-55-5 • 62.4% • 13 seasons • 1 title
85th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Colorado 1989
SRS 24.4
Worst Season
Colorado 1984
SRS -12.7
Biggest Improvement
Colorado 1985
20.3 SRS