Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: William Chadwick
William Chadwick: 48th pct vs Phil Sarboe: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Phil SarboeWilliam Chadwick
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Phil Sarboe
Phil Sarboe: 41st pct vs William Chadwick: 38th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs William Chadwick
Phil Sarboe: 92nd pct vs William Chadwick: 91st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs William Chadwick
Phil Sarboe: 0 titles vs William Chadwick: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs William Chadwick
Phil Sarboe: 5 seasons vs William Chadwick: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: William Chadwick
William Chadwick: 69.8% vs Phil Sarboe: 40.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Phil Sarboe
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
William Chadwick
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Phil SarboeWilliam Chadwick
EliteStrongAverageLean
1909Actual season year • SRS range -8.8 to 2.61949
Active comparison point
Phil Sarboe • 1945
1945 Washington State
Best season6-2-1 • SRS 2.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
William Chadwick
Nearest year 1913 • Mississippi State
6-1-1 • SRS -3.9 • SP Overall —
Phil Sarboe holds a 6.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Sarboe | |||||
| Washington State | 1945-1949 | 5 | 17-26-3 | -3.1 | 2.6Highest peak |
| William Chadwick | |||||
| Mississippi State | 1909-1913 | 5 | 29-12-2 | -3.5 | 1.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Phil Sarboe
17-26-3 • 40.2% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
-5.6 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Washington State 1945
SRS 2.6
Worst Season
Washington State 1948
SRS -5.6
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1947
2.0 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →William Chadwick
29-12-2 • 69.8% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
48th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Mississippi State 1910
SRS 1.2
Worst Season
Mississippi State 1912
SRS -8.8
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 1910
4.9 SRS