Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Babe Horrell vs CA Lueder
Babe Horrell: 60th pct vs CA Lueder: 58th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
CA LuederBabe Horrell
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Babe Horrell
Babe Horrell: 55th pct vs CA Lueder: 49th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Babe Horrell
Babe Horrell: 91st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Babe Horrell vs CA Lueder
Babe Horrell: 0 titles vs CA Lueder: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: CA Lueder vs Babe Horrell
CA Lueder: 7 seasons vs Babe Horrell: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: CA Lueder
CA Lueder: 66.7% vs Babe Horrell: 44.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
CA Lueder
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Babe Horrell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
CA LuederBabe Horrell
EliteStrongAverageLean
CA Lueder: 1909 West Virginia
1903Actual season year • SRS range -0.6 to 7.31944
Active comparison point
CA Lueder • 1903
1903 Virginia Tech
Best season5-1 • SRS 5.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Babe Horrell
Nearest year 1939 • UCLA
6-0-4 • SRS 7.0 • SP Overall —
CA Lueder trails by a 1.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA Lueder | |||||
| Virginia Tech | 1903-1903 | 1 | 5-1 | 5.6Best quality | 5.6 |
| West Virginia | 1909-1909 | 1 | 4-3-2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Babe Horrell | |||||
| UCLA | 1939-1944 | 6 | 24-31-6 | 3.2 | 7.3Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →CA Lueder
9-4-2 • 66.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Virginia Tech 1903
SRS 5.6
Worst Season
West Virginia 1909
SRS 0.8
Biggest Improvement
West Virginia 1909
-4.8 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Babe Horrell
24-31-6 • 44.3% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
7.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
UCLA 1942
SRS 7.3
Worst Season
UCLA 1944
SRS -0.6
Biggest Improvement
UCLA 1942
6.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.