Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hutchins vs Jack Ingersoll
Charles Hutchins: 60th pct vs Jack Ingersoll: 58th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jack IngersollCharles Hutchins
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hutchins vs Jack Ingersoll
Charles Hutchins: 60th pct vs Jack Ingersoll: 58th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Charles Hutchins
Charles Hutchins: 92nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hutchins vs Jack Ingersoll
Charles Hutchins: 0 titles vs Jack Ingersoll: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hutchins vs Jack Ingersoll
Charles Hutchins: 6 seasons vs Jack Ingersoll: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Charles Hutchins
Charles Hutchins: 60.9% vs Jack Ingersoll: 55.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jack Ingersoll
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Charles Hutchins
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jack IngersollCharles Hutchins
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jack Ingersoll: 1916 Virginia TechCharles Hutchins: 1906 Wisconsin
1902Actual season year • SRS range 1.8 to 9.41916
Active comparison point
Jack Ingersoll • 1916
1916 Virginia Tech
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest dropNew stop: Virginia Tech7-2 • SRS 8.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.8%
YoY SRS
+5.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Charles Hutchins
Nearest year 1907 • Wisconsin
3-1-1 • SRS 1.8 • SP Overall —
Jack Ingersoll holds a 6.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Ingersoll | |||||
| Colgate | 1911-1911 | 1 | 3-6 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Virginia Tech | 1916-1916 | 1 | 7-2 | 8.6Best quality | 8.6 |
| Charles Hutchins | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1902-1903 | 2 | 11-11 | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| Wisconsin | 1906-1907 | 2 | 8-1-1 | 5.6 | 9.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jack Ingersoll
10-8 • 55.6% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Virginia Tech 1916
SRS 8.6
Worst Season
Colgate 1911
SRS 3.5
Biggest Improvement
Virginia Tech 1916
5.1 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Charles Hutchins
19-12-1 • 60.9% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
92nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Wisconsin 1906
SRS 9.4
Worst Season
Wisconsin 1907
SRS 1.8
Biggest Improvement
Wisconsin 1906
4.8 SRS