Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Gresham Poe
Gresham Poe: 66th pct vs Leon McCarty: 59th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gresham PoeLeon McCarty
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Gresham Poe vs Leon McCarty
Gresham Poe: 54th pct vs Leon McCarty: 54th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Gresham Poe vs Leon McCarty
Gresham Poe: 0 titles vs Leon McCarty: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gresham Poe vs Leon McCarty
Gresham Poe: 1 seasons vs Leon McCarty: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Gresham Poe
Gresham Poe: 75.0% vs Leon McCarty: 56.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gresham Poe
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Leon McCarty
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gresham PoeLeon McCarty
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range 5.9 to 7.91919
Active comparison point
Gresham Poe • 1903
1903 Virginia
Best seasonWorst season7-2-1 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Leon McCarty
Nearest year 1919 • Kansas
3-2-3 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall —
Gresham Poe holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gresham Poe | |||||
| Virginia | 1903-1903 | 1 | 7-2-1 | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Leon McCarty | |||||
| Kansas | 1919-1919 | 1 | 3-2-3 | 6.9 | 6.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Gresham Poe
7-2-1 • 75.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
66th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Virginia 1903
SRS 6.9
Worst Season
Virginia 1903
SRS 6.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Leon McCarty
3-2-3 • 56.3% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kansas 1919
SRS 6.9
Worst Season
Kansas 1919
SRS 6.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.