Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Pat Dye vs Kyle Whittingham
Pat Dye: 90th pct vs Kyle Whittingham: 89th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Pat Dye vs Kyle Whittingham
Pat Dye: 90th pct vs Kyle Whittingham: 89th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Kyle Whittingham
Kyle Whittingham: 92nd pct vs Pat Dye: 89th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Kyle Whittingham
Kyle Whittingham: 63rd pct vs Pat Dye: 35th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Kyle Whittingham vs Pat Dye
Kyle Whittingham: 0 titles vs Pat Dye: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Kyle Whittingham
Kyle Whittingham: 22 seasons vs Pat Dye: 19 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Pat Dye
Pat Dye: 70.7% vs Kyle Whittingham: 66.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Pat Dye and Kyle Whittingham look similar in overall strength.
Pat Dye and Kyle Whittingham look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Kyle Whittingham
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 13.1
92th pct
Elite
Pat Dye
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 14.1
93th pct
Elite
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
1-0 • SRS 24.9 • SP Overall 23.6
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
49.3 / 29.4
Finish
#4
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Pat Dye
Nearest year 1992 • Auburn
5-5-1 • SRS 0.2 • SP Overall -0.5
Kyle Whittingham holds a 24.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +26.8 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Whittingham | |||||
| Utah | 2004-2025 | 22 | 167-86 | 10.7 | 24.9Highest peak |
| Pat Dye | |||||
| East Carolina | 1974-1979 | 6 | 48-18-1 | 6.5 | 15.4 |
| Wyoming | 1980-1980 | 1 | 6-5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Auburn | 1981-1992 | 12 | 99-39-4 | 14.0Best quality | 22.0 |
Closing takeaway
167-86 • 66.0% • 22 seasons • 0 titles
63rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Utah 2004
SRS 24.9
Worst Season
Utah 2005
SRS 3.0
Biggest Improvement
Utah 2025
15.2 SRS
153-62-5 • 70.7% • 19 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Auburn 1983
SRS 22.0
Worst Season
East Carolina 1975
SRS -1.2
Biggest Improvement
East Carolina 1976
16.6 SRS