Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Nelson Norgren
Nelson Norgren: 45th pct vs Edwin Sweetland: 40th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Nelson NorgrenEdwin Sweetland
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Nelson Norgren
Nelson Norgren: 100th pct vs Edwin Sweetland: 74th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Edwin Sweetland vs Nelson Norgren
Edwin Sweetland: 0th pct vs Nelson Norgren: 0th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Edwin Sweetland vs Nelson Norgren
Edwin Sweetland: 0 titles vs Nelson Norgren: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Edwin Sweetland
Edwin Sweetland: 7 seasons vs Nelson Norgren: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Nelson Norgren
Nelson Norgren: 54.2% vs Edwin Sweetland: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Nelson Norgren
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Edwin Sweetland
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Nelson NorgrenEdwin Sweetland
EliteStrongAverageLean
Edwin Sweetland: 1913 West VirginiaEdwin Sweetland: 1914 Tulane
1908Actual season year • SRS range -37.4 to 44.01917
Active comparison point
Nelson Norgren • 1916
1916 Utah
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-2 • SRS 44.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+77.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Edwin Sweetland
Nearest year 1914 • Tulane
3-3-1 • SRS -31.1 • SP Overall —
Nelson Norgren holds a 75.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Norgren | |||||
| Utah | 1914-1917 | 4 | 13-11 | -10.7 | 44.0Highest peak |
| Edwin Sweetland | |||||
| Colgate | 1908-1908 | 1 | 4-3 | 15.0Best quality | 15.0 |
| West Virginia | 1913-1913 | 1 | 3-4-2 | -7.7 | -7.7 |
| Tulane | 1914-1914 | 1 | 3-3-1 | -31.1 | -31.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Nelson Norgren
13-11 • 54.2% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
44.0 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Utah 1916
SRS 44.0
Worst Season
Utah 1917
SRS -37.4
Biggest Improvement
Utah 1916
77.0 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Edwin Sweetland
10-10-3 • 50.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
-31.1 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Colgate 1908
SRS 15.0
Worst Season
Tulane 1914
SRS -31.1
Biggest Improvement
West Virginia 1913
-22.7 SRS