Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Maddock vs Ralph Hutchinson
Joseph Maddock: 55th pct vs Ralph Hutchinson: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Joseph MaddockRalph Hutchinson
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Maddock
Joseph Maddock: 55th pct vs Ralph Hutchinson: 51st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Maddock vs Ralph Hutchinson
Joseph Maddock: 65th pct vs Ralph Hutchinson: 63rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Maddock vs Ralph Hutchinson
Joseph Maddock: 0 titles vs Ralph Hutchinson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Maddock
Joseph Maddock: 20 seasons vs Ralph Hutchinson: 18 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Joseph Maddock
Joseph Maddock: 67.7% vs Ralph Hutchinson: 59.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Joseph Maddock
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Ralph Hutchinson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Joseph MaddockRalph Hutchinson
EliteStrongAverageLean
Joseph Maddock: 1924 OregonRalph Hutchinson: 1903 TexasRalph Hutchinson: 1918 Washington & Jefferson
1901Actual season year • SRS range -8.3 to 7.31924
Active comparison point
Joseph Maddock • 1908
1908 Utah
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-2-1 • SRS 7.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
58.3%
YoY SRS
+15.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ralph Hutchinson
Nearest year 1905 • Texas
5-4 • SRS 2.6 • SP Overall —
Joseph Maddock holds a 4.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Maddock | |||||
| Utah | 1905-1908 | 4 | 17-7-1 | -0.9 | 7.3Highest peak |
| Oregon | 1924-1924 | 1 | 4-2-3 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Ralph Hutchinson | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1901-1901 | 1 | 4-6 | -8.3 | -8.3 |
| Texas | 1903-1905 | 3 | 16-7-2 | 4.9 | 6.2 |
| Washington & Jefferson | 1918-1918 | 1 | 2-2 | — | — |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Longer run
Full profile →Joseph Maddock
21-9-4 • 67.7% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
20 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Utah 1908
SRS 7.3
Worst Season
Utah 1907
SRS -7.7
Biggest Improvement
Utah 1908
15.0 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Ralph Hutchinson
22-15-2 • 59.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Texas 1903
SRS 6.2
Worst Season
Dickinson (PA) 1901
SRS -8.3
Biggest Improvement
Texas 1903
14.5 SRS