Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Paul Bixler
Paul Bixler: 52nd pct vs Thomas Fitzpatrick: 40th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Thomas FitzpatrickPaul Bixler
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Paul Bixler
Paul Bixler: 78th pct vs Thomas Fitzpatrick: 44th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Bixler
Paul Bixler: 11th pct vs Thomas Fitzpatrick: 6th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Paul Bixler vs Thomas Fitzpatrick
Paul Bixler: 0 titles vs Thomas Fitzpatrick: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Paul Bixler vs Thomas Fitzpatrick
Paul Bixler: 6 seasons vs Thomas Fitzpatrick: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Thomas Fitzpatrick
Thomas Fitzpatrick: 57.0% vs Paul Bixler: 38.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Thomas Fitzpatrick
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Paul Bixler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Thomas FitzpatrickPaul Bixler
EliteStrongAverageLean
Paul Bixler: 1947 Colgate
1919Actual season year • SRS range -30.4 to 17.11951
Active comparison point
Thomas Fitzpatrick • 1921
1921 Utah
Best season3-2-1 • SRS 3.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
58.3%
YoY SRS
+3.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Bixler
Nearest year 1946 • Ohio State
4-3-2 • SRS 17.1 • SP Overall —
Thomas Fitzpatrick trails by a 13.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Fitzpatrick | |||||
| Utah | 1919-1924 | 6 | 23-17-3 | -5.8 | 3.9 |
| Paul Bixler | |||||
| Ohio State | 1946-1946 | 1 | 4-3-2 | 17.1Best quality | 17.1Highest peak |
| Colgate | 1947-1951 | 5 | 14-27-2 | -9.1 | -4.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Thomas Fitzpatrick
23-17-3 • 57.0% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Utah 1921
SRS 3.9
Worst Season
Utah 1919
SRS -30.4
Biggest Improvement
Utah 1920
30.7 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Paul Bixler
18-30-4 • 38.5% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
17.1 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Ohio State 1946
SRS 17.1
Worst Season
Colgate 1949
SRS -15.8
Biggest Improvement
Colgate 1950
11.8 SRS