Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Brady HokeChuck Stobart

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: Brady Hoke

Brady Hoke: 50th pct vs Chuck Stobart: 38th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Decisive edge

Edge: Brady Hoke

Brady Hoke: 75th pct vs Chuck Stobart: 56th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Narrow edge

Edge: Chuck Stobart

Chuck Stobart: 24th pct vs Brady Hoke: 16th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Brady Hoke vs Chuck Stobart

Brady Hoke: 0 titles vs Chuck Stobart: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Clear edge

Edge: Brady Hoke

Brady Hoke: 21 seasons vs Chuck Stobart: 18 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Brady Hoke

Brady Hoke: 53.3% vs Chuck Stobart: 45.2%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Brady Hoke has the edge in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Narrow edge

Brady Hoke has the edge in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Brady Hoke

Above average

Raw avg SP Overall: 0.6

59th pct

Above average

Chuck Stobart

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -1.3

52th pct

Mixed

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Brady HokeChuck Stobart
EliteStrongAverageLean
Brady Hoke: 2009 San Diego StateBrady Hoke: 2011 MichiganBrady Hoke: 2017 TennesseeBrady Hoke: 2020 San Diego StateChuck Stobart: 1982 UtahChuck Stobart: 1989 Memphis
1977Actual season year • SRS range -21.8 to 15.82023

Active comparison point

Brady Hoke2011

Selected

2011 Michigan

Best seasonNew stop: Michigan

11-2 • SRS 15.8 • SP Overall 20.0

Win %

84.6%

YoY SRS

+9.2

SP Off / Def

39.3 / 18.8

Finish

#12

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Chuck Stobart

Nearest year 1994Memphis

Profile

6-5 • SRS -3.4 • SP Overall -6.2

Brady Hoke holds a 19.2-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +25.5 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Brady Hoke
Ball State2003-2008634-38-8.04.2
San Diego State2009-2023640-32-2.36.6
Michigan2011-2014431-209.0Best quality15.8Highest peak
Tennessee2017-201710-2-7.3-7.3
Chuck Stobart
Toledo1977-1981524-31-1-11.4-0.9
Utah1982-1984316-17-12.14.1
Memphis1989-1994629-36-1-1.37.9

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher ceiling

Brady Hoke

105-9253.3%17 seasons • 0 titles

15.8 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

Michigan 2011

SRS 15.8

Worst Season

Ball State 2004

SRS -21.0

Biggest Improvement

San Diego State 2010

18.3 SRS

Steadier arc

Chuck Stobart

69-84-345.2%14 seasons • 0 titles

24th pct steadiness score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Memphis 1992

SRS 7.9

Worst Season

Toledo 1977

SRS -21.8

Biggest Improvement

Toledo 1979

19.0 SRS