Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jack Chevigny vs Ray George
Jack Chevigny: 60th pct vs Ray George: 60th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jack Chevigny vs Ray George
Jack Chevigny: 60th pct vs Ray George: 60th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Ray George vs Jack Chevigny
Ray George: 72nd pct vs Jack Chevigny: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jack Chevigny vs Ray George
Jack Chevigny: 92nd pct vs Ray George: 90th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jack Chevigny vs Ray George
Jack Chevigny: 0 titles vs Ray George: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jack Chevigny vs Ray George
Jack Chevigny: 3 seasons vs Ray George: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Jack Chevigny
Jack Chevigny: 48.3% vs Ray George: 46.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jack Chevigny
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Ray George
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
7-2-1 • SRS 13.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ray George
Nearest year 1951 • Texas A&M
5-3-2 • SRS 14.3 • SP Overall —
Jack Chevigny trails by a 0.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Chevigny | |||||
| Texas | 1934-1936 | 3 | 13-14-2 | 9.2 | 13.5 |
| Ray George | |||||
| Texas A&M | 1951-1953 | 3 | 12-14-4 | 9.5 | 14.3 |
Closing takeaway
13-14-2 • 48.3% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Texas 1934
SRS 13.5
Worst Season
Texas 1935
SRS 6.8
Biggest Improvement
Texas 1936
0.6 SRS
12-14-4 • 46.7% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Texas A&M 1951
SRS 14.3
Worst Season
Texas A&M 1953
SRS 6.8
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1953
-0.5 SRS