Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Odus Mitchell
Odus Mitchell: 41st pct vs Buddy Teevens: 28th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Odus MitchellBuddy Teevens
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Odus Mitchell
Odus Mitchell: 65th pct vs Buddy Teevens: 60th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Buddy Teevens
Buddy Teevens: 21st pct vs Odus Mitchell: 17th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Buddy Teevens vs Odus Mitchell
Buddy Teevens: 0 titles vs Odus Mitchell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Odus Mitchell vs Buddy Teevens
Odus Mitchell: 14 seasons vs Buddy Teevens: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Odus Mitchell
Odus Mitchell: 52.2% vs Buddy Teevens: 22.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Buddy Teevens sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeBuddy Teevens sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Odus Mitchell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Buddy Teevens
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -9.2
29th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Odus MitchellBuddy Teevens
EliteStrongAverageLean
Buddy Teevens: 2002 Stanford
1953Actual season year • SRS range -24.0 to 11.52004
Active comparison point
Odus Mitchell • 1966
1966 North Texas
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-2 • SRS 11.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+28.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Buddy Teevens
Nearest year 1992 • Tulane
2-9 • SRS -11.4 • SP Overall -11.1
Odus Mitchell holds a 22.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odus Mitchell | |||||
| North Texas | 1953-1966 | 14 | 69-63-7 | -6.8 | 11.5Highest peak |
| Buddy Teevens | |||||
| Tulane | 1992-1996 | 5 | 10-46 | -12.7 | -1.5 |
| Stanford | 2002-2004 | 3 | 10-23 | -0.2Best quality | 9.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Odus Mitchell
69-63-7 • 52.2% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
North Texas 1966
SRS 11.5
Worst Season
North Texas 1960
SRS -24.0
Biggest Improvement
North Texas 1966
28.2 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Buddy Teevens
20-69 • 22.5% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-19.6 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Stanford 2004
SRS 9.7
Worst Season
Tulane 1993
SRS -19.6
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 2004
16.4 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.