Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs Tom Craft
Phil Sarboe: 35th pct vs Tom Craft: 33rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tom CraftPhil Sarboe
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Phil Sarboe
Phil Sarboe: 41st pct vs Tom Craft: 33rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Tom Craft vs Phil Sarboe
Tom Craft: 93rd pct vs Phil Sarboe: 92nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs Tom Craft
Phil Sarboe: 0 titles vs Tom Craft: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs Tom Craft
Phil Sarboe: 5 seasons vs Tom Craft: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Phil Sarboe vs Tom Craft
Phil Sarboe: 40.2% vs Tom Craft: 39.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tom Craft sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTom Craft sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Craft
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -3.9
44th pct
Mixed
Phil Sarboe
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tom CraftPhil Sarboe
EliteStrongAverageLean
1945Actual season year • SRS range -7.8 to 2.62005
Active comparison point
Tom Craft • 2005
2005 San Diego State
Best season5-7 • SRS -0.6 • SP Overall -2.4
Win %
41.7%
YoY SRS
+2.0
SP Off / Def
26.7 / 29.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Phil Sarboe
Nearest year 1949 • Washington State
3-6 • SRS -3.6 • SP Overall —
Tom Craft holds a 3.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Craft | |||||
| San Diego State | 2002-2005 | 4 | 19-29 | -3.2 | -0.6 |
| Phil Sarboe | |||||
| Washington State | 1945-1949 | 5 | 17-26-3 | -3.1 | 2.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Tom Craft
19-29 • 39.6% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
San Diego State 2005
SRS -0.6
Worst Season
San Diego State 2002
SRS -7.8
Biggest Improvement
San Diego State 2003
6.1 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Phil Sarboe
17-26-3 • 40.2% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
2.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Washington State 1945
SRS 2.6
Worst Season
Washington State 1948
SRS -5.6
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1947
2.0 SRS