Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: John Cooper
John Cooper: 90th pct vs Bill Yeoman: 85th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Bill YeomanJohn Cooper
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: John Cooper
John Cooper: 96th pct vs Bill Yeoman: 91st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Bill Yeoman vs John Cooper
Bill Yeoman: 10th pct vs John Cooper: 9th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Yeoman vs John Cooper
Bill Yeoman: 0 titles vs John Cooper: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bill Yeoman vs John Cooper
Bill Yeoman: 25 seasons vs John Cooper: 24 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: John Cooper
John Cooper: 69.2% vs Bill Yeoman: 59.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
John Cooper has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeJohn Cooper has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Bill Yeoman
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 8.6
81th pct
Strong
John Cooper
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 13.0
91th pct
Elite
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Bill YeomanJohn Cooper
EliteStrongAverageLean
John Cooper: 1985 Arizona StateJohn Cooper: 1988 Ohio State
1962Actual season year • SRS range -20.0 to 28.22000
Active comparison point
Bill Yeoman • 1969
1969 Houston
Best season9-2 • SRS 24.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
81.8%
YoY SRS
+2.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
John Cooper
Nearest year 1977 • Tulsa
3-8 • SRS -20.0 • SP Overall -21.7
Bill Yeoman holds a 44.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Yeoman | |||||
| Houston | 1962-1986 | 25 | 160-108-8 | 9.6 | 24.1Longest stop |
| John Cooper | |||||
| Tulsa | 1977-1984 | 8 | 56-32 | -0.5 | 7.6 |
| Arizona State | 1985-1987 | 3 | 25-9-2 | 13.6 | 20.9 |
| Ohio State | 1988-2000 | 13 | 111-43-4 | 15.4Best quality | 28.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Bill Yeoman
160-108-8 • 59.4% • 25 seasons • 0 titles
-10.2 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Houston 1969
SRS 24.1
Worst Season
Houston 1986
SRS -10.2
Biggest Improvement
Houston 1976
23.8 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →John Cooper
192-84-6 • 69.2% • 24 seasons • 0 titles
90th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Ohio State 1995
SRS 28.2
Worst Season
Tulsa 1977
SRS -20.0
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 1978
22.5 SRS