Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Jack PardeeMark Helfrich

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: Mark Helfrich

Mark Helfrich: 93rd pct vs Jack Pardee: 78th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Similar

Similar: Mark Helfrich vs Jack Pardee

Mark Helfrich: 95th pct vs Jack Pardee: 93rd pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Narrow edge

Edge: Jack Pardee

Jack Pardee: 16th pct vs Mark Helfrich: 11th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Jack Pardee vs Mark Helfrich

Jack Pardee: 0 titles vs Mark Helfrich: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Mark Helfrich vs Jack Pardee

Mark Helfrich: 4 seasons vs Jack Pardee: 3 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Narrow edge

Edge: Mark Helfrich

Mark Helfrich: 69.8% vs Jack Pardee: 66.2%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Mark Helfrich and Jack Pardee look similar in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Similar

Mark Helfrich and Jack Pardee look similar in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Jack Pardee

Elite

Raw avg SP Overall: 16.9

96th pct

Elite

Mark Helfrich

Elite

Raw avg SP Overall: 18.9

97th pct

Elite

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Jack PardeeMark Helfrich
EliteStrongAverageLean
1987Actual season year • SRS range 2.2 to 27.12016

Active comparison point

Jack Pardee1989

Selected

1989 Houston

Best seasonBiggest drop

9-2 • SRS 25.9 • SP Overall 25.8

Win %

81.8%

YoY SRS

+8.1

SP Off / Def

50.3 / 29.7

Finish

#14

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Mark Helfrich

Nearest year 2013Oregon

Profile

11-2 • SRS 26.7 • SP Overall 28.7

Jack Pardee trails by a 0.8-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +3.5 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Jack Pardee
Houston1987-1989322-11-115.625.9
Mark Helfrich
Oregon2013-2016437-1617.1Best quality27.1Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Steadier arc

Jack Pardee

22-11-166.2%3 seasons • 0 titles

16th pct steadiness score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Houston 1989

SRS 25.9

Worst Season

Houston 1987

SRS 3.0

Biggest Improvement

Houston 1988

14.8 SRS

Higher career quality

Mark Helfrich

37-1669.8%4 seasons • 0 titles

93rd pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Oregon 2014

SRS 27.1

Worst Season

Oregon 2016

SRS 2.2

Biggest Improvement

Oregon 2014

0.4 SRS