Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 75th pct vs Bill Meek: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Bill MeekFisher DeBerry
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 87th pct vs Bill Meek: 78th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 44th pct vs Bill Meek: 30th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Meek vs Fisher DeBerry
Bill Meek: 0 titles vs Fisher DeBerry: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bill Meek vs Fisher DeBerry
Bill Meek: 23 seasons vs Fisher DeBerry: 23 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 60.8% vs Bill Meek: 47.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Fisher DeBerry and Bill Meek look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarFisher DeBerry and Bill Meek look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Bill Meek
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.0
67th pct
Above average
Fisher DeBerry
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.8
69th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Bill MeekFisher DeBerry
EliteStrongAverageLean
Bill Meek: 1955 HoustonBill Meek: 1957 SMUBill Meek: 1968 Utah
1951Actual season year • SRS range -13.3 to 21.02006
Active comparison point
Bill Meek • 1958
1958 SMU
Best season6-4 • SRS 17.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+12.3
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#18
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fisher DeBerry
Nearest year 1984 • Air Force
8-4 • SRS 9.4 • SP Overall 12.8
Bill Meek holds a 7.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Meek | |||||
| Kansas State | 1951-1954 | 4 | 15-22-2 | -5.5 | 4.5 |
| Houston | 1955-1956 | 2 | 13-6-1 | 7.4Best quality | 13.2 |
| SMU | 1957-1961 | 5 | 17-29-4 | 6.0 | 17.0 |
| Utah | 1968-1973 | 6 | 33-31 | 3.4 | 14.6 |
| Fisher DeBerry | |||||
| Air Force | 1984-2006 | 23 | 169-109-1 | 2.7 | 21.0Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Bill Meek
78-88-7 • 47.1% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
4 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
SMU 1958
SRS 17.0
Worst Season
Kansas State 1952
SRS -13.3
Biggest Improvement
Kansas State 1953
17.8 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Fisher DeBerry
169-109-1 • 60.8% • 23 seasons • 0 titles
75th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Air Force 1985
SRS 21.0
Worst Season
Air Force 1993
SRS -11.2
Biggest Improvement
Air Force 1994
17.2 SRS