Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Hal Lahar
Hal Lahar: 41st pct vs Mike Locksley: 32nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Hal LaharMike Locksley
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Hal Lahar vs Mike Locksley
Hal Lahar: 59th pct vs Mike Locksley: 57th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Hal Lahar vs Mike Locksley
Hal Lahar: 7th pct vs Mike Locksley: 6th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Hal Lahar vs Mike Locksley
Hal Lahar: 0 titles vs Mike Locksley: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mike Locksley vs Hal Lahar
Mike Locksley: 17 seasons vs Hal Lahar: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Hal Lahar
Hal Lahar: 54.7% vs Mike Locksley: 35.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Locksley sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMike Locksley sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Hal Lahar
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Mike Locksley
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -5.3
41th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Hal LaharMike Locksley
EliteStrongAverageLean
Hal Lahar: 1957 HoustonHal Lahar: 1962 ColgateMike Locksley: 2019 Maryland
1952Actual season year • SRS range -31.8 to 9.02025
Active comparison point
Hal Lahar • 1958
1958 Houston
Best season5-4 • SRS 9.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.6%
YoY SRS
+7.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Locksley
Nearest year 2009 • New Mexico
1-11 • SRS -20.3 • SP Overall -19.1
Hal Lahar holds a 29.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hal Lahar | |||||
| Colgate | 1952-1967 | 11 | 53-40-8 | -11.4 | 0.2Longest stop |
| Houston | 1957-1961 | 5 | 24-23-2 | 3.6Best quality | 9.0 |
| Mike Locksley | |||||
| New Mexico | 2009-2011 | 3 | 2-26 | -23.3 | -20.3 |
| Maryland | 2019-2025 | 7 | 32-36 | 0.1 | 8.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Hal Lahar
77-63-10 • 54.7% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Houston 1958
SRS 9.0
Worst Season
Colgate 1967
SRS -31.8
Biggest Improvement
Colgate 1964
16.7 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Mike Locksley
34-62 • 35.4% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
-26.3 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Maryland 2023
SRS 8.4
Worst Season
New Mexico 2011
SRS -26.3
Biggest Improvement
Maryland 2019
20.7 SRS