Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs John DeSaulles
David Gibbs: 51st pct vs John DeSaulles: 51st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David GibbsJohn DeSaulles
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: John DeSaulles vs David Gibbs
John DeSaulles: 30th pct vs David Gibbs: 30th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs John DeSaulles
David Gibbs: 0 titles vs John DeSaulles: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs John DeSaulles
David Gibbs: 1 seasons vs John DeSaulles: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: David Gibbs
David Gibbs: 100.0% vs John DeSaulles: 85.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
David Gibbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDavid Gibbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David Gibbs
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 5.4
74th pct
Strong
John DeSaulles
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David GibbsJohn DeSaulles
EliteStrongAverageLean
1902Actual season year • SRS range -2.3 to -2.22014
Active comparison point
David Gibbs • 2014
2014 Houston
Best seasonWorst season1-0 • SRS -2.3 • SP Overall 5.4
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
30.4 / 23.6
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
John DeSaulles
Nearest year 1902 • Virginia
8-1-1 • SRS -2.2 • SP Overall —
David Gibbs trails by a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Gibbs | |||||
| Houston | 2014-2014 | 1 | 1-0 | -2.3 | -2.3 |
| John DeSaulles | |||||
| Virginia | 1902-1902 | 1 | 8-1-1 | -2.2 | -2.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →David Gibbs
1-0 • 100.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Houston 2014
SRS -2.3
Worst Season
Houston 2014
SRS -2.3
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →John DeSaulles
8-1-1 • 85.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Virginia 1902
SRS -2.2
Worst Season
Virginia 1902
SRS -2.2
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.